tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7094652.post3449172938768720939..comments2024-03-23T14:36:09.980+00:00Comments on Neil Mitchell's Blog (Haskell etc): 13% faster than GHC*Neil Mitchellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13084722756124486154noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7094652.post-48573884108078547192007-05-17T08:17:00.000+01:002007-05-17T08:17:00.000+01:00Anon: I did initial results last night, I suspect ...Anon: I did initial results last night, I suspect the results will be GHC takes around 4 times as long as C, mine is the same speed - i.e. mine is 4 times faster.<BR/><BR/>stefanha: Blogger ate that sentance several times, it was right the first time! No details yet, but once the algorithms etc have settled I'll explain them properly.Neil Mitchellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13084722756124486154noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7094652.post-40796826406552151092007-05-17T06:27:00.000+01:002007-05-17T06:27:00.000+01:00> The particular benchmark I've been working on is...> The particular benchmark I've been working on is "print . length =<< getContents" or "wc -l".<BR/><BR/>"wc -l" should probably be "wc -m" or "wc -c".<BR/><BR/>Any details on your deforestation technique?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7094652.post-76333606099685232732007-05-17T01:51:00.000+01:002007-05-17T01:51:00.000+01:00Wow. That's some exciting stuff.I'm really really ...Wow. That's some exciting stuff.<BR/><BR/>I'm really really eager to see the 'wc -l' results.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com